Search for: "United States v. Sealed Search Warrant"
Results 61 - 80
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 5:05 am
" The court recognized that there was no Georgia case law on point, but cited to United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm
Superior Court has jurisdiction under the Stored Communications Act (SCA) because it is a “court of criminal jurisdiction of a State authorized by law of that State to issue search warrants. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:46 am
In US v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 8:54 pm
” The only portion of the file not under seal was the search warrant stating that it was based on “evidence of a crime. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
Ed. 877 (1878) (emphasis added) (recognizing Fourth Amendment protection of sealed letters or packages in the mail); see also United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:54 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
Ashley v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:54 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
If Mohamud had been the target, hypothetically, then a warrant would normally have been required under United States v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 9:43 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
TX4: State didn't call officer and relied on his report and failed in its burden of proving exigency
18 Feb 2012, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
First, in support of this argument, Plaintiff cites only a United States Supreme Court case analyzing the privacy language in the Freedom of Information Act's ("FOIA") statutory exemption provisions. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
