Search for: "United States v. Sosa"
Results 61 - 80
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 8:38 am
“Cualquier persona es vulnerable a ser víctima de robo de identidad. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Purporting to follow the Supreme Court’s guidance on customary international law in Sosa v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:23 pm
For support for that new proposition the panel relies on an old First Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Sosa v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
” Somewhat surprisingly, the panel went further to question whether the alleged torture by a non-state actor would fall within the requirements for actionable ATS offenses set forth in the Supreme Court’s Sosa decision. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
United States and BG Group v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
United States, 802 F.Supp.2d 834 (W.D. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Said and United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
This is evident in, for example, his discussion of the Court’s prior decision on the ATS, Sosa v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm
This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:30 am
Pena-Irala (and more recently the 2004 Supreme Court decision in Sosa v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm
First, according to the Court in the Kiobel decision, ATS cases are subject to the presumption against extraterritoriality recently rearticulated in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
… There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The most interesting supplemental brief was filed by the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The most interesting supplemental brief was filed by the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:29 am
In 2004, in Sosa v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
