Search for: "United States v. Sprint Communications"
Results 61 - 80
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Boost Mobile/Sprint, 2017 WL 2535871 (N.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 3:58 pm
Sprint Communications Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
United States, 9 The United States Supreme Court also recognized that the discovery of communications is distinct from the discovery of the underlying facts of those communications. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Buyer purchased more than $500,000 of Sprint shares, which were then sold shortly after news of the deal went public, regulators said. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) (records of dialed calls); United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:15 am
The phone is described as a “pay-as-you-go Samsung/Sprint cellular telephone. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Secretary of State to identify and report countries whose laws prohibit adoption involving immigration to the United States. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
Knowing that the bill was designed to challenge Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
It was evident in this week’s hearing that the United States national security apparatus remains heavily focused upon counterterrorism. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:22 am
H.R.2810 – National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 H.R.621 – Disposal of Excess Federal Lands Act of 2017 S.J.Res.34 – A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services”. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Alabama, 124 U.S. 465 (1888). 2139 Sprint Communications Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:52 pm
(Techdirt) Germany German court rules that IP addresses are not personal information (Techdirt) Google Image search thumbnails 'infringement' under German ruling (Public Knowledge) Netherlands Dutch Court imposes real-world punishment for virtual theft (Ars Technica) United Kingdom IP and media regulation will be examined in digital review (Out-Law) United States Campus Computing Project Study reveals costs of… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica) New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak) Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46) Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
T-Mobile/Sprint Merger Approved The Commission on October 16, 2019 voted 3-2 to approve the T‑Mobile/Sprint Merger, with both Democratic Commissioners voting against approval. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
.' " Sprint Communications Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's… [read post]
