Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company of California"
Results 61 - 80
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company.[8] Just four years after the Federal Trade Commission Act was enacted, the Supreme Courtestablished the “the prevailing standard of analysis” for determining whether an agreement constitutes an unreasonable restraint of trade under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.[9] Justice Louis Brandeis, who as an adviser to President Woodrow Wilson was instrumental in creating the FTC, described the scope of this “rule… [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:47 am
For example, in Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” CBE’s argument that the federal regulatory purpose differs from California’s failed “because the federal and state goals are identical: to protect public health and welfare. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
” California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order ordering the state to create a regulatory approach for blockchain and cryptocurrency companies. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(The defendants were a British oil company, a Dutch oil company, and their Nigerian subsidiary.) [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
” Then the other 49 states can adopt standards identical to California’s, or none whatsoever. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
Murphy Oil USA, on January 13), National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending holding of petition pending decision in MetLife v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
The state courts of California, like many states, held that these sorts of contract provisions were unconscionable as applied to class actions. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Lazy Oil Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Rowland-Shea and Mirza proposed that to remedy this problem, policymakers should prohibit leasing on low-potential lands, reform the federal oil and gas program, increase renewable energy on public lands, end oil and gas leasing altogether medium-term, and require oil companies to use or give up unused public leaseholds. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:43 am
United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
” The agreements solidify the companies’ willingness to adhere to California’s regulations and offer other states the option to adopt the stricter standards, as the terms of the agreement apply beyond California’s borders. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am
Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act is proof that compromise is still possible in the halls of the United States Congress and that Washington can still work for manufacturers and citizens across the country. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:30 pm
Montera v. [read post]
