Search for: "United States v. Stephens" Results 61 - 80 of 3,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
United States, demanding warrants to overcome the reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm by centerforartlaw
DABUS also encountered resistance in the United States, with the USPTO denying patent applications despite some indications of support within the field. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:26 am by Stephen E. Sachs
They are adhering, not to the Constitution of the United States, but to a much higher law, Sturgeon's Law, which is that "90% of everything is crap. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am by Ilya Somin
United States (1992), which established the rule that the Tenth Amendment bars federal "commandeering" of state governments. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It was a huge setback for efforts to dismantle the ongoing privilege of whiteness in the United States and is symptomatic of resistance among movement conservatives on and off the Court to efforts to build a more inclusive society.In both respects, Students for Fair Admissions is a deeply undemocratic decision. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
According to the Illinois Republican, there had been a conspiracy among four “workmen” of the Democratic Party to nationalize slavery in the United States, which had culminated in Dred Scott v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
He summarised the position as follows: “It is therefore taken as a constitutional gospel in all commonwealth jurisdictions and also the United States that courts have no business handling religious questions. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am by Stephen E. Sachs
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am by jonathanturley
Those efforts received a boost recently from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which rejected the free speech claims of North Carolina State University Professor Stephen Porter. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
” This exclusionary criterion ensures lack of viewpoint diversity, and makes the Collegium an effective proxy for the law industry in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” In her 102-page ruling, Wallace declared that “[a]fter considering the arguments on both sides, the Court is persuaded that ‘officers of the United States’ did not include the President of the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
On this view, while Section One identified the citizens of the United States, it did not confer new rights of citizenship. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm by jonathanturley
The case could set up a major test for gun rights for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]