Search for: "United States v. Strong, Sr."
Results 61 - 80
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
In the case of “Aunt Sally v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Seven years later, and in the United States, she married A.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
To say this is merely an unusual feature of an antidiscrimination law would not be strong enough. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
And gay people can now marry, thanks to a changing climate of opinion, and thanks to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Title IX states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be . [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:01 pm
This system reflects the complicated religious/secular marriage traditions in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
-based DNS expertise and in order to preserve stability, it makes sense to headquarter the new corporation in the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Yet patronymy was, and remains, dominant in the United States—at least for children born in wedlock. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:00 pm
As many in the United States struggle with unemployment, layoffs, furloughs, pay cuts, and other adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women struggle just to be treated just like everyone else. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In the United States, however, the rate has steadily increased over the last twenty years. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
Department of Veterans’ Affairs and United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, Connor H. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The PDA was necessitated by a Supreme Court decision two years earlier, General Electric v. [read post]
