Search for: "United States v. Teed"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Meanwhile, the Ninth on the Ohio teed up Rapelje v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
Writing a brief for the United States before the Supreme Court is a very different enterprise than writing a brief for a private party. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:00 am
John Marsh, Russell Beck, and I just recorded another episode of the Fairly Competing podcast (which will be available Tuesday morning), and we discussed the latest chapter in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:56 pm
The most recent detailed discussion of this from a federal court is in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:08 am
These cases are teed up to reach the United States Supreme Court in the 2012 Term. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm
” The approach of the United States, arguing as amicus curiae, was a shade different. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
The United States Supreme Court must be despairing of how many patent appeals are coming its way. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court must be despairing of how many patent appeals are coming its way. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:07 am
United States Dept. of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir.1982), where the Court had held that judicial approval is necessary of settlements in FLSA lawsuits. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 1996) ("The nonobviousness of the accused device, evidenced by the grant of a United States patent, is relevant to the issue of whether the change therein is substantial. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm
The same issue has been teed up, briefed, argued, and could be decided any day by the United States Supreme Court in Bruesewitz. [read post]
