Search for: "United States v. Tri-State Home Improvement Co."
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
None of these is going to do anything to close the racial achievement gap or indeed to improve education for anyone. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:57 am
” (United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami discussed proposals to reallocate resources within the Enforcement Division to improve efficiency, including: • increasing the number of trial unit attorneys to present a “credible threat” to defendants, improve the ability to win at trial and increase settlement outcomes; • increasing administrative, paralegal, and para-professional support, to free up… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
"—Abstract.Mikhail V. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares… [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
As long as plaintiffs' counsel are smart enough to plead what PLAL tells them to, they're home free. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise… [read post]
