Search for: "United States v. Two Parcels of Property"
Results 61 - 80
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
THE POWER TO TAKE UNDER THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION: A RECOGNIZED GOVERNMENTAL POWER BUT SUBJECT TO THEORETICAL LIMITATIONS The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution clearly recognizes two sometimes countervailing concepts. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
. parcel of real property,’ here the Ordinance’s requirement of a monetary payment is directly linked to a property owner’s desire to change the use of a specific, identifiable unit of property. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
This argument failed, the Court stated, because it conflated financial self-dealing with usurpation of a corporate opportunity, with only the latter having been plead and argued on appeal.The Court then examined the church's claim under the standard set forth in Dixon v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:58 pm
United States, 98 Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
With that as an introduction, here is a brief description of the main challenges property owners can assert against condemning entities: Public Use: The Constitutions of Michigan and the United States allow government-authorized entities to condemn property for “public use. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:57 am
Two years later, the United States initiated action to seek judicial declaration of abandonment and an order quieting title to the Government to the abandoned right of way. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:15 am
By Glen Hansen In Hashalom v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
According to the opinion, the prosecution arose because Miller and his pastor William Wellons wanted to buy a parcel of real estate from a farmer as an investment property. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am
The Martin’s Beach case involved two parcels of land bounded on the east by Highway 1 and on the west by the Pacific Ocean (“Property”). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm
The land was zoned to allow for one dwelling unit per acre; however, Pulte could increase the allowable density to two units per acre by purchasing TDRs from agricultural properties in a different area of Montgomery County. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:53 am
United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
Beutz v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 6:27 pm
Following the Council’s rezoning action, Sea Coast applied to the Planning Board for a four-lot subdivision of the entire property, as well as a subdivision in the Motherhouse consisting of sixty-six affordable and twenty-two market-rate senior housing units. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
Beutz v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm
” The state countered that courts should take into account the entire body of the state’s property laws and the owner’s reasonable expectations, which in this case would require the court to look at both parcels together. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Zanelli v. [read post]
