Search for: "United States v. Waite, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2008, 7:06 am
In any civil action under this title, the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:07 am
United States Dept. of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir.1982), where the Court had held that judicial approval is necessary of settlements in FLSA lawsuits. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am
United States). [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
The NRA, in NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC, V. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm
Greenwood, Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
is a recent pain pump case in front of the United States District Court of Colorado. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
Last year the United States Supreme Court held in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Carranza v Nordstrom Inc., 2014 WL 10537816 (C. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
Google Inc., [2014] 4 HKLRD 493; A. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
Applebees International, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (which decides minimum wage and overtime cases in Missouri) ruled in favor of a group of servers and bartenders who sued Applebee's for failing to pay minimum wage. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am
LG Electronics, Inc. overruled the Federal Circuit’s precedent Mallinckrodt Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:10 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:45 am
United States National Pageant, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
In Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
Within that framework, any local litigation requirement (place of filing and waiting periods for example) is a matter for arbitrators primarily to interpret and apply, and courts should review their interpretation with deference.The Court's syllabus is set out below.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus BG GROUP PLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
IBP, Inc., 542 F.Supp.2d. 790, 808 (M.D.Tenn.2008) (citing Alvarez, 339 F.3d at 902-03;Bonilla v. [read post]
