Search for: "Upjohn Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
Upjohn, 139 F. 3d 1313, 1318 (9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:24 pm
Lessons for Corporate Counsel The D.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
For what it's worth, in addition to the cases mentioned, my list of canonical cases would include: Togstad (formation of atty-cl relationship); Upjohn (corporate atty-cl privilege); Fordham (reasonableness of fees); and maybe Birbrower (UPL and MJP). [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
Carey & Danis is a national law firm that represents individuals injured by America's largest corporations. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
If gives people a fair voice to speak out against corporate corruption, and it allows the innocent victims of corporate greed to obtain fair and just compensation for all of their harms and losses. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
In the seminal case, Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:53 am
Brevetti, a partner at K&L Gates, writes: When it comes to white-collar crime, popular opinion today is to view American corporations solely as perpetrators. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 12:29 am
Celgene International Holdings Corporation The Moscow City Commercial Court fulfilled a claim made by a local generic company Nativa and granted a license to use a patented drug of Celgene International Holdings Corporation in connection to the cancer drug, Lenalidomide-Nativ. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Upjohn found communications between in-house counsel and relatively low-level corporate employees to be privileged because "they were made to counsel for Upjohn acting as such, at the direction of corporate superiors in order to secure legal advice from counsel. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:38 am
Cmwlth. 2015) (citing Upjohn). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
Upjohn Co., 122 F.3d 1478, 1479 (Fed. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
” After reviewing the Upjohn decision and conflicting federal district court decisions, Judge Swiney adopted the functional-equivalent doctrine because it “acknowledges the reality of corporate activity” and upholds “a corporation’s legitimate interest in relying on frank exchanges between its legal counsel and non-employee individuals or organizations who behave as the functional equivalent of an employee. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
” After reviewing the Upjohn decision and conflicting federal district court decisions, Judge Swiney adopted the functional-equivalent doctrine because it “acknowledges the reality of corporate activity” and upholds “a corporation’s legitimate interest in relying on frank exchanges between its legal counsel and non-employee individuals or organizations who behave as the functional equivalent of an employee. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:18 am
For example, combining MONSANTO and PHARMACIA [Pharmacia & Upjohn AB v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Ill. 1987).Indiana: Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
This clarification is normally referred to as an Upjohn warning, and it should be a common practice by interviewers regardless of where the interview is being conducted or who is being interviewed.[26] This warning is a fundamental part of the ethical requirements a lawyer faces when representing a company and interviewing employees of the company. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:19 am
"As Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
Upjohn, 139 F. 3d 1313, 1318 (9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
