Search for: "Utter v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consider the reforms of Solon and then of Cleisthenes in Athens, the outcome of the Social War in Rome, and of course the Reconstruction Amendments, the expansion of the franchise to women, and similar moments in the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
To the extent that the case does implicate the First Amendment, it is constitutional under the standard for false utterances set forth by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hart (Pa. 2011) (holding that "an attempt to lure … does not occur upon the mere offer of a ride in a motor vehicle to a child, but, rather, involves only situations where a child is provided a further enticement or inducement to enter the vehicle"); United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:56 am by Michael Oykhman
  It is no longer the law that the Crown simply proves that the offender possessed or uttered the counterfeit money: R v Freng, 1993 CanLII 913 (BCCA). [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The monograph ran with the basic idea that our nation, the United States, has a “civil religion” organized around the Constitution, and that this is a faith to which we must all choose to subscribe. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
  This is not to suggest that the current cultural revolution in the United states (in particular) or in the liberal democratic camp (on general) ought to be faulted. [read post]