Search for: "VIKING INC" Results 61 - 80 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court has issued its highly anticipated opinion in Viking River Cruises Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:33 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Viking Industrial Security, Inc., et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division:  Somerset County, Docket Nos. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:37 am by Michael S. Levine
As a follow-up to my post yesterday concerning the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in In the Matter of Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC, Insurance Appeals, where the New York high court confirmed that policyholders may allocate all amounts of loss to a single policy and a single policy year, Syed Ahmad, a partner in our Insurance Coverage Counseling and Litigation team, was interviewed by Law360 about the decision’s broad-ranging implications. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:28 am by Unknown
In May 2014, Lemelson took a short position in Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc. on behalf of a hedge fund he advised and partly owned. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Dan Kelly
There have been a number of NFL headlines out of Minnesota this season, most of them ranging from ridiculous to deflating, that is, if you've been following the (mostly) hapless Vikings and their hapless stadium. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:12 am by Carina Novell
At the time, this was considered a direct application of the United States Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:38 am
- Management consultant Cliff Mintz of BioInsights Inc. at his Bio Job Blog Department of Energy Requests Proposals for Green Building Recognition - Hartford attorney Brad N. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
Dakota Motorcycles USA Inc., Opposition No. 91162109 (March 5, 2008) [not precedential].Cruising through the du Pont factors, the Board found the goods to be identical (2nd factor). [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:05 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court’s Viking River majority opinion to hold that plaintiffs do not lose representative standing once their individual PAGA claims are compelled to arbitration. [read post]