Search for: "VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
What the second Circuit did say was that, like in the Jack Daniel’s case, the Wavy Baby used plaintiff’s trademarks and trade dress throughout the design of its product. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
VIP Products LLC. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:21 am
VIP Products LLC. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
” Jack Daniel’s Props., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
VIP Products LLC (covered in this excellent post by Lisa Ramsey). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 12:47 am
Supreme Court (SC) in Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Consumers might also be misled into believing that the handbag is an authentic product endorsed by the original luxury brands, which could result in claims of false endorsement or false advertising. [read post]