Search for: "Valencia v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm
At the same time that the defendant was driving the wrong way in the southbound lanes of the Meadowbrook State Parkway, a limousine was proceeding south in the left southbound lane of the Meadowbrook State Parkway. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
The United States patent was granted on 7 July 1998. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:21 am
From Daurbigney v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:29 am
In Other News… United States Secretary of State Rex Tillerson this month appeared to moderate hawkish comments he made on the South China Sea at his confirmation hearing, where he suggested that the U.S. should deny China access to the islands it claims in the South China Sea. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
United States PRC President Xi Jinping has agreed to discuss the South China Sea with President Obama next week on the sidelines of the fourth Nuclear Security Summit. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
By Little V. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:30 am
The deal’s predictably less good for minorities because the bargaining’s done in a locked unit. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:06 am
As Wikipedia explains, under the laws of evidence in effect in the United States, a presumption of a particular fact can be made without the aid of proof in some situations. . . . [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
(Class 99) United States US General Federal Circuit judicial watch (Patently-O) US Patent Reform USPTO prepares for historic rule making effort (Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents Top 5: Countries where US patents originate (Patent Quality Matters) Top 5: US patent classifications in 2010 (Patent Quality Matters) Essay: Not so confidential: A call for restraint in sealing court records (Patently-O) What Congress should do to improve the patent system, step 6… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am
Referring to the backlash, she discussed the issues at stake, especially the aftermath of the overturn of Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Supreme Court stripped tribal governments of their criminal authority over non-Indians in Oliphant v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
And, as with other useful arts, the United States, and most other countries, recognize the importance of protecting the intellectual property rights of the designers, inventors, artisans and engineers responsible for creating furniture designs. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
