Search for: "Van Order v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
And finally, in the most recent C-204/21 Commission v Poland, the Court asserted its authority in the strongest possible terms by proclaiming that, “the review of Member States’ compliance with the requirements arising from Article 2[…] TEU falls fully within the jurisdiction of the Court” (para. 62), and that Article 2 TEU is not merely a statement of policy guidelines or intentions, but rather “contains values which are an integral part of the… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice Beth van Schaack, arguing last year that “[w]e cannot overlook the growing perception by many states, especially from the Global South, that the concerted response to Ukraine is a stark exception. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:01 pm
From Van Loon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am
Earlier in July 2023, a blog post by Jacob van de Kerkhof discussed the shortcomings of the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Sanchez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
If the Member States can’t reach total consensus on the text, it could go to a vote by the Member State governments in which a two-thirds majority would be required for adoption. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
I removed the State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
Nor do we want to add to the lively discussion on the choice-of-law- aspects regarding civil liability (see, amongst others, van Calster, Ho-Dac, Dias and, before the Proposal, Rühl). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Negligent hiring and employment have long been found to be legitimate bases of recovery in this state. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:53 am
Wang v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:40 pm
Case Name: Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:10 am
This resulted in a diminution of value of £148,000 and these were the damages ordered under this head. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:14 pm
Particularly, the Court of Justice refers to Ferrari v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:38 pm
Randle, Fletcher and Van Ellis, all over 100 years old, stated through their attorney Damario Solomon-Simmons that they had not been informed of the reasoning for the dismissal beyond a short one-page order released by Judge Caroline Wall. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
See Caryl Richards, Inc. at 304, Van Sickle v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
One web-based media report stated, without qualification, that Agent Orange “increases bladder cancer risk. [read post]
