Search for: "Van v. Van" Results 61 - 80 of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Henri Van Breda case (Van Breda v Media 24 Limited and Others [2017] ZASCA 97) has confirmed that cameras in courts are not only here to stay, but that this is mandated by the South African Constitution in order to facilitate open justice and the right of the public to hear and see what goes on in our courts. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:28 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Deadly van crash: passenger vans raise wide array of safety concerns, feds say, March 31, 2015, By Katie LaGrone, WPTV Channel 5 More Blog Entries: Hilyer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:44 am by Larry Ribstein
Van Gorkom and the Delaware legislature’s subsequent “fix” of that result. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On October 1, 2010, Judge Joseph Van Jura of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas issued an Opinion and Order in the case of Glushefski v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:19 am by Paul Caron
Wendy Gerzog (Baltimore), Van Alen: A Reasonable Consistency, 142 Tax Notes 223 (Jan. 13, 2014): In Van Alen [v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
Vesna Lazić, Family Private International Law Issues Before the European Court of Human Rights: Lessons to Be Learned from Povse v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:31 am
Van Colle and Another v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary House of Lords “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the state's decision to call him as a witness. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 2:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today invoked the Supreme Court’s decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 2:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today invoked the Supreme Court’s decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]