Search for: "Vars v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Furthermore, in Batson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm
But again, the name of an exemplary product is unimportant.Last year, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion on a case (TiVo v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:02 am
National Football League v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:02 am
National Football League v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
For example, the state of the application should not be stored in the memory of your app instance, and services such as the datastore should be used to persist state. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:46 am
Theoretically, this could raise the amount of damages in Apple v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:16 pm
In Digital Sin, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
var addthis_pub="blogengineextensionaddthis"; [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
var addthis_pub="blogengineextensionaddthis"; [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:48 pm
Following the Apple v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:43 am
var addthis_pub="blogengineextensionaddthis"; [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:43 am
var addthis_pub="blogengineextensionaddthis"; [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:23 am
I considered this an immensely important pre-trial decision, and Judge Koh's order cites case law that stresses the importance of this, such as this passage from an opinion in Zubulake v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:33 pm
And the only way to find out is to let push come to shove.Judge Koh may dread the notion but we'll probably see more Apple v. [read post]
