Search for: "Vermont State Medical Board" Results 61 - 80 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
  Unlike most State compensation systems that presently struggle with both expeditious medical delivery as well the value and responsibility of medical care, the ACA provides a uniform system and expeditious system. [read blog]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
  Unlike most State compensation systems that presently struggle with both expeditious medical delivery as well the value and responsibility of medical care, the ACA provides a uniform system and expeditious system. [read blog]
5 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm by Jon L. Gelman
  Unlike most State compensation systems that presently struggle with both expeditious medical delivery as well the value and responsibility of medical care, the ACA provides a uniform system and expeditious system. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:31 am by Andrew Delaney
If it’s upheld, the person can appeal to the Vermont Supreme Court.Of course, there are timelines for all this, as set forth by statute. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:38 pm by Joe Consumer
”  Medical boards - where the coverup always ends. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:15 pm
  During this past year, the Institute of Medicine, the Government Accountability Office, and the FDA's own science board have all issued reports that essentially reach the same conclusion: The FDA is largely incapable of protecting the public from unsafe medical devices and drugs. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has fired Joe Paterno and President Graham Spanier over the scandal. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
  A few other places (Delaware, Vermont, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands), had no comment k jurisprudence at all. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 14-181Issue: Whether the Second Circuit – in a two-to-one panel decision that disregarded the considered opinion advanced by the United States as amicus – erred in holding that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) preempts Vermont's health care database law as applied to the third-party administrator for a self-funded ERISA plan. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:49 pm by Daniel Richardson
 The Board’s decision stated up front that it could not reach a conclusion in part because Applicant had understated her difficulties in caring for herself, indicating that this would be “spelled out below. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 3:10 am
  Annual rankings are based on data gleaned from the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), specifically regarding the number of disciplinary actions taken against doctors in 2007. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 12:50 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  An outstanding question is whether and to what extent that state’s veterinary medical board may take punitive action against the veterinarian based on the alleged federal violation. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:00 pm
Additionally, General Motors spokesperson Alan Adler stated the company will replace the switch free of charge for anyone living in a state that is not subject to the current recall at the request of the owner. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
References within the article to California decisions, while not precedential outside that state, nevertheless provide important examples of the types of workplace violence incidents that commissions and boards find compensable. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 4:53 am by Ed Wallis
Our attorneys are representing women in all fifty states and Canada who have been injured. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am by Arina Shulga
As of now, 31 states (including the District of Columbia) have enacted similar statutes, with Maryland and Vermont leading the way by becoming the first states to do so in 2010. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" Chairman of the Essex County Board of Supervisors Randall T. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 10:54 pm by Daniel Richardson
§ 1353 expressly states that the Board’s decisions are neither conclusive nor admissible in separate or subsequent actions between the former employee and his or her former employer. [read post]