Search for: "Vice v State"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 3:56 am
No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or administrative body; v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:59 am
” Diss. op. at 4 (citing United States v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 5:56 pm
” Page v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
Pennsylvania before the Supreme Court of the United States, Vice President Mike Pence was not listed as a co-intervenor. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:05 am
In the third decision issued by the Court of Chancery in connection with the action styled as Holley v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:15 am
Buttonwood Tree Value Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:15 pm
Lebanon County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 1:29 pm
Bishop v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:04 am
Vice Chancellor Glasscock criticized the board's Revlon process, stating: The Plaintiff has demonstrated that a reasonable likelihood exists that the sales... [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:39 am
The Eighth Circuit, among the more parsimonious in allowing non-Guidelines sentences, reversed the sentence given to former Wal-Mart vice chairman Thomas Coughlin after his guilty plea for defrauding the company (United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:23 am
Vice (great case name), the United States Supreme Court remanded to the lower court with instructions to determine attorney's fees where there is a mix of frivolous and non-frivolous... [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:31 am
Authorities at the school were cognizant of the issue, including vice-principle misdeeds. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:07 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:32 am
It's part of why I think Trump v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:30 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 10:55 am
Update: Gravel v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
In a recent opinion issued by Vice Chancellor Parsons, Carlyle Investment Management, L.L.C., et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments… [read post]
