Search for: "Virtus Investments, Ltd."
Results 61 - 80
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
That Facebook has recently launched its own search product[10] says it all: entry into search only requires investment capital, which the antitrust laws rightfully do not regard as an entry barrier. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Capital, Ltd., 2012 U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:05 pm
Regarding domestic industry, the Complainants state that a domestic industry exists by virtue of TPL’s substantial investments in the development and enforcement of the ‘336 patent through its significant licensing activities, which have resulted in numerous licensees that practice the inventions claimed in the ‘336 patent. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
Madoff Investment Securities was a SIPC member. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
“When freedom does not have a purpose, when it does not wish to know anything about the rule of law engraved in the hearts of men and women, when it does not listen to the voice of conscience, it turns against humanity and society. [read post]
Sunlight is the best disinfectant: open justice and company law proceedings in Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm
In In re Skytours Travel Ltd, Doyle v Bergin [2010] IEHC 531 (9 July 201o) Laffoy J refused to hear a dispute between shareholders in camera. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:48 pm
Regarding domestic industry, FlashPoint states that a domestic industry exists by virtue of FlashPoint’s licensees’ significant investment in plant equipment, significant employment of labor and capital, and substantial investment in the exploitation of the asserted patents, including engineering and research and development with respect to articles protected by the asserted patents. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:45 pm
Ltd., and Sony Corporation. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
The consequences of the authority vested in DRT under Sub-Section (3) of Section 17 necessarily implies that the DRT is entitled to question the action taken by the secured creditor and the transactions entered into by virtue of Section 13(4) of the Act. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:44 am
The consequences of the authority vested in DRT under Sub-Section (3) of Section 17 necessarily implies that the DRT is entitled to question the action taken by the secured creditor and the transactions entered into by virtue of Section 13(4) of the Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:24 am
In this background, it is worth noting the observation of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Associated Cement Companies Ltd. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm
Pragmatus further states that a domestic industry exists by virtue of the activities of Pragmatus’s domestic licensees, including significant investment in plant and equipment, significant employment of labor and capital, and substantial investment in research and development with respect to the asserted patents. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:35 pm
In this background, it is worth noting the observation of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Associated Cement Companies Ltd. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:27 pm
Although there was a subsequent decision of the single judge to the contrary in Niskalp Investments and Trading Company Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:12 am
Sistema's action comes after the licences of Sistema's affiliate Sistema Shyam TeleServices Ltd. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:13 pm
Pragmatus further states that a domestic industry exists by virtue of the activities of Pragmatus’s domestic licensees, including significant investment in plant and equipment, significant employment of labor and capital, and substantial investment in research and development with respect to the asserted patents. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
A. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
As a result, the issue of repeat arbitrators can jeopardize public trust and faith in international arbitration.In response, arbitral institutions should take steps to address this trend by requiring their arbitrators to disclose past and present repeat appointments made by the same party or counsel and by instituting a clear policy that allows the arbitrator to know when he or she should disclose past engagements and whether his or her integrity could be questioned by repeat appointments.Definition… [read post]
