Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 61 - 80 of 6,658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2024, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
  In November, Arizona voters will vote on a referendum to protect the right to pre-viability abortions. [read post]
Their right to protest on school grounds—while important—extends no further than the right afforded to workers, parents, voters, civic groups, or anyone else to engage in similar protest activity on public property.And third, the regulation of any expression, including protests, must be (at least at public universities) viewpoint-neutral as a formal matter and must also be enforced in a viewpoint-neutral way. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
Forthrightly, I'm not certain at all that the voters were, in fact, fully "aware" of the way the California treated various prisoners when it passed the underlying initiative (in fact, I'm extremely confident that they weren't), but I understand and appreciate that we pretend that they were when we seek to harmonize various statutory provisions.I just have one question.Imagine that you're a lawyer -- as, indeed, most of you are. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm by Daly Barnett
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
More broadly, of course a campaigning public official has to be able to express his views about foreign policy, and statements to voters framed as demands to foreign officials are a pretty normal and constitutionally protected means of doing so. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
The ECtHR Declines to Intervene on Religious Slaughter: on Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium [2024] ECHR 137, which we noted here. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rather, much government property is a "nonpublic forum"—a place where some members of the public are invited, but which is "'… not by tradition or designation a forum for public communication'" (Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:41 am by Rick Hasen
The following is a guest post from Travis Crum: Next week, the Supreme Court will consider whether to grant cert in Cascino v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mississippi’s Jim Crow Laws Still Haunt Black Voters Today  (Marshall Project). [read post]