Search for: "W & W Holdings, LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 1,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff must plead enough details about the subject matter of her case to present a story that holds together and that supports her accusations with a basis in plausible, articulable facts. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am by INFORRM
AustraliaBarilaro v Google LLCDecision Date: June 6, 2022 The Federal Court of Australia has ordered Google LLC to pay AUD $715,000, as damages to John Barilaro, the applicant who was the target of defamatory content and false imputations on YouTube in violation of the law. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
Supreme Court held that it would violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment for Colorado to force a website designer to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple, because it would compel her to create speech in which she did not believe (303 Creative LLC, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[38] As then-Commissioner Paul Atkins once said, “[W]e must be vigilant that the shareholder proposal process does not result in the tyranny of the minority. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:11 am by jonathanturley
It is little more than an elite version of an addict panhandling in Times Square — except that Hunter apparently panhandled effectively in different countries for almost a decade, reportedly using a web of more than 20 LLC corporations and banking accounts. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:52 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Supreme Court Holds Retaining Excess Value Violated Takings Clause appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
   These appear to be “hold harmless” clauses designed to protect taxpayers and parish collectors when parish sub-jurisdictions delay reporting boundary changes or rate changes. [read post]