Search for: "W. Gomez" Results 61 - 80 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Olson (PricewaterhouseCoopers, Washington, D.C.), In Memoriam: Kenneth W. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
This Court leaves that question for another day—assuming there are other plaintiffs out there who, like Gomez won’t take “yes” for an answer. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The dissenting justices characterized the holding as a narrow one, however, and suggested that a defendant eager to end a dispute (and thwart a potential class litigation) simply need tender the relief arguably due, rather than merely offer to do so (Campbell-Ewald Co. v Gomez, January 20, 2016, Ginsburg, R.). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
The dissenting justices characterized the holding as a narrow one, however, and suggested that a defendant eager to end a dispute (and thwart a potential class litigation) simply need tender the relief arguably due, rather than merely offer to do so (Campbell-Ewald Co. v Gomez, January 20, 2016, Ginsburg, R.). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Gomez that an unaccepted offer of complete relief under Rule 68 does not render a case moot and thus does not end a purported class or collective action. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Gomez, 14-857, which was once rescheduled before its relist, (fittingly) involves an ad agency that, after being sued for an ill-advised text-message campaign for the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
Molina-Gomez, First Circuit: The district court erred by denying Appellant's motion to suppress statements he made to United States Customs and Border Protection officers. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am by Matt Kaiser
Molina-Gomez, First Circuit: The district court erred by denying Appellant’s motion to suppress statements he made to United States Customs and Border Protection officers. [read post]