Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 61 - 80 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
To the extent you get “from one company” you can at least take out the bias of the particular methodology by controlling w, for example, “baking soda” as a control product. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Reid: the issue was not with the piece of the exemption that was granted, but that the vulnerabilities around DRM patched w/video games was just one piece of evolving threat. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
Most public companies will need to provide new disclosures about corporate governance, director qualifications and compensation matters in proxy statements for their 2010 annual meetings. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
No matter what words the parties used in a contract, the noncompliant act would be voidable, not void. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:32 am
The same principle applies to the grant of a patent right by license as well as assignment. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In companies, people choose voluntary creative behaviors more often when they perceive the work environment as more fair; they experience more intrinsic motivation. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Big companies like Samsung and Apple can survive, but small/moderate companies w/o resources to bring massive survey evidence could have problem. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd and OthersDecision Date: November 14, 2022 The Constitutional Court in South Africa ruled that a court can refuse to grant a trading corporation damages for non-patrimonial loss for defamation in cases involving matters of public interest. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Millennials don’t know what they have: don’t take for granted what the internet provides. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:09 pm by Alex Moss
But that doesn’t stop private companies from trying to keep information about their patents secret—even when their disputes to go court, where the public has a right to know what happens. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by centerforartlaw
For decades, Chisso hid the mercury leak and the company has been silencing the event since 1925. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Should the court grant limited injunctive relief? [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Those w/o the money can’t experience the narrative instilled in the object. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
Turns out there was, as we all suspected, someone named Wells – in fact, John W. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]