Search for: "W. et al v. United States of America" Results 61 - 80 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
Si les interesa ir al hueso, pueden comenzar por la parte V de la Opinión de la mayoría en "Doe", allá por la página 12. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes E. coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body, as well as on the tail, or flagellum,[2] and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
  In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"Assigned to this significant forfeiture case is Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, which is captioned of United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:58 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El Hobbs Act; 18 USC 1951 et seq (extorsión en el comercio interestatal con intención de privar de propiedad a la víctima) La ley federal titulada “Hobbs Act”, codificada en 18 U. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Bill Cosby: invested a lot in reputation as America’s dad, which has since been destroyed. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 is responsible for over 90% of the cases of HUS that develop in North America. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]