Search for: "WALGREENS, CO."
Results 61 - 80
of 330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2020, 1:38 pm
Walgreen Co., 605 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir.2010). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
Walgreen Co.,] a Sabbath accommodation case involving a Seventh-day Adventist. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 9:46 am
He previously worked for the Walgreen Co. for 15 years in numerous capacities, from divisional vice president and assistant general counsel to senior attorney. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:07 pm
Co. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Walgreen Co., (La. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Walgreen, Co., which concerns a Seventh-day Adventist who was fired from Walgreens because he could not attend a training session on his Sabbath, offers the court an opportunity to correct the “undue hardship” standard established in TWA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
Walgreen, 2011-Ohio-6167 (suggesting that the Cort test may no longer be valid in determining whether a private cause of action exists in a statute.) [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Walgreen, 2011-Ohio-6167 (suggesting that the Cort test may no longer be valid in determining whether a private cause of action exists in a statute.) [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
Walgreen Co., which asks exactly how much employers must do under federal law to accommodate an employee’s religious practices. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:57 am
Walgreen Co. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
Walgreen Co. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Walgreen Co., 18-349. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 7:34 am
The board at Tesla, Inc. appointed a new chairperson last month, naming the chief financial officer of Australia’s largest telecommunications company to replace a Tesla co-founder. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm
Empire Storage & Ice Co., 336 U.S. 490, 498 (1949). [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:02 pm
In those cases, principally Mid Continent Nail Corp. and Walgreen Co., Commerce first looked at whether the merchandise in question is within the literal terms of the order. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Ramirez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 7:09 am
Walgreen Co. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
Honey SmacksIn June the Kellogg Co. issued an international recall of its Honey Smacks cereal in relation to a multistate Salmonella outbreak. [read post]