Search for: "WOODS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 61 - 80
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
Bravin reports, again in the Journal, that she identified the “honest services” trio of cases as likely having the broadest practical impact for the Justice Department this Term: “In the rest of the Justice Department [outside the Solicitor General's Office], this is a three-case term. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Defense Department et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division) explained that there is a sea change from the previous view at the DOJ. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Filarsky v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm
Department of Transportation cracks down on distraction from cars’ onboard information and entertainment systems; Mike Masnick suspects the measure won’t work as intended, as appears to have been the case with early texting bans [Techdirt; earlier here, etc.] [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 4:21 am
Bowling v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
” In Wood v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
” Justice Pfeifer, to the Wood County Prosecutor, about what the consequence should be for a statutory violation in this case. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
As noted above, similar questions were considered in Lumba, and also in the more recent case of R (Kambadzi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 1 WLR 1299, which was the subject of a [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 9:04 am
They also discussed Doe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
See Hawkins v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Daniel Byman analyzed the Justice Department’s affidavit of the IRGC member. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:09 am
Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
On 4 May 2016, a confidentiality trial with the intriguing name of A1, B2 and C3 v A Government Department was due to begin before Jay J. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
Last week the Departments of Justice and Education issued a letter intended to provide guidance to colleges and universities regarding the Court’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
What makes this decision remarkable is that it strips away the improper judge-made law that was created by four Republican justices in Kreiner v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:18 am
Department of Treasury (11-45) and Wood v. [read post]
