Search for: "Wade v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
‘Tincher’ Altered the Law (Somewhat)Back in 2014, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released its much-anticipated products liability decision in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am by Bridget Crawford
Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981) Commentary: Margo Kaplan Judgment: Cynthia Godsoe Chapter 15. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:30 am by Nicole Huberfeld
Nicole Huberfeld On March 2d, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:44 am by Mark Graber
A government official in Kentucky is refusing to implement the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Harvie Wilkinson, the Court held the suit to be non-justiciable because it would require the Court to "wade into sensitive and particularized military matters. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am by Paul Smith
Wade, there are few if any examples of people over the long term rejecting the legitimacy of a Supreme Court decision on a controversial issue. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Such laws are increasingly common; it will be interesting to see whether the Court wants to wade into the abortion thicket again. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Kay, 2015 ONCA 112 [11] The issue on appeal is whether the respondent is, or should be, in the discretion of the court, precluded from bringing a common law claim for intrusion upon seclusion in the Superior Court because PHIPA creates an exhaustive code. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Coffing Hoist Division, 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987) – an exclusion later extended to compliance with mandatory government standards by the Superior Court (an appellate court in Pennsylvania) – and of a plaintiff’s comparative fault in Kimco Development Corp. v. [read post]