Search for: "Waggoner v. Waggoner"
Results 61 - 80
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am
At National Review’s Bench Memos blog, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:07 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am
The court properly granted defendant Litchfield Cavo's motion to dismiss, since there was no evidence that Cavo, as superseding counsel, either contributed to the loss or could have done anything to correct the errors of predecessor counsel (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1 [2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]; Rivas v Raymond Schwartzberg & Assoc., PLLC, 52 AD3d 401 [2008]). [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am
The claim should also be reinstated against Herrick Feinstein (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010] [finding that sound policy considerations support the tolling of the statute of limitations under the continuous representation doctrine while the representation of the same matter in which the malpractice is alleged is ongoing]). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am
" "In opposition, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Horn and Sager defendants committed malpractice by allegedly not calling the plaintiffs CPA as a witness, by advising him to enter into a modification of his March 12, 1999 child custody stipulation, or by failing to move to disqualify his former wife’s counsel (see generally Waggoner v Caruso, 14 NY3cl 874, 903 NYS2d 333 [2010]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 648 NYS2d 871 [1996]). [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:55 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1 51 Dept2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:28 pm
In-Sink-Erator, 201 F.3d 894 (7th Cir. 2000) (tool and die maker); Waggoner, 169 F.3d 481 (production worker); Corder v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:55 am
State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
CORE v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
The purpose of the continuous representation doctrine is to avoid forcing a client to jeopardize the relationship with the attorney handling his or her case during the period that the attorney continues to represent them (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7 [1st Dept 2009], af(d, 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Kristin Waggoner weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:03 am
The case was Waggoner v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
At Townhall, Kristen Waggoner laments that the court’s decision in June Medical Services v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Kristen Waggoner at National Review. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:20 am
Waggoner, Young, Lind, Entres & Kraft Title Co. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am
The Amended Complaint alleges that Todtman Nachamie represented plaintiffs from August 2004 until April 2005, whereupon RFS represented plaintiffs from April 20058 until April 2012. 9 Plaintiffs rely on two cases which apply the continuous representation doctrine to toll the statute of limitations as to a prior law firm’s representation when attorneys from a prior firm left and moved to another firm (HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn, 63 AD3d 534 [l st Dept… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
In Ayestas v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
