Search for: "Wagner v. Chambers"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
In Bryan v UK the European Court stated: 37. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
MGN LIMITED v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
Rules create the so-called “bright lines” between entitlement and disentitlement; rules are also, by their nature, insensitive to particular household circumstances.In two recent decisions of the the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeal Chamber, the rules have been challenged as being insufficiently sensitive to individual household needs: RG v SSWP and North Wiltshire DC (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) and IB v Birmingham CC [2011] UKUT 23 (AAC). [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
Article 9 breached – see this case note from Garden Court North chambers Sultan of Pahang, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616 (25 May 2011): Sultan of Pahang not entitled to diplomatic immunity as Pahang is sultanate of Malaysia, not a state for purpose of immigration rules. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 am
(Thursday night I ducked out of the reception early, to catch the Padres v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
We have had a number of post on these issues this week – from Dominic Crossley, Adam Wagner and Mark Thomson. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
Building on Adam Wagner’s earlier posts, I also offer a possible explanation as to why the panel of the Grand Chamber refused a rehearing of the Greens case. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
In the news As the UK government is requesting the referral of Greens and M.T. v UK to the Grand Chamber, with the intention that the European Court of Human Rights reconsiders the issue of prisoner voting, the Committee of Ministers, vested with the responsibility to oversee the enforcement of the Court’s judgments, has put on hold its ongoing review of the UK’s compliance with the decision in Hirst v UK (No. 2). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
In the news: Although prisoner voting appears to have taken a back seat this week, the Daily Mail has reported that the UK government has asked the European Court of Human Rights to refer the decision of Greens and MT v UK to the Grand Chamber. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
As the UK awaits the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision in Khawaja and Tahery v UK, both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have held that hearsay evidence was compatible with article 6. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am
– Charon QC: Paul Chambers has lost his first appeal against a criminal conviction for a tweet in which he (jokingly, he says) threatened to blow up Nottingham airport. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm
Opinion: “Gary Flood v Times Newspapers” – William Bennett, Inforrm’s Blog: We posted on this case, relating to media freedom of expression, here. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am
In Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found, unanimously, a violation of article 10 ECHR. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
(Data available here.)On June 2, 1967, Luis José Monge, was killed in the gas chamber in Colorado. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
Rolf Wagner/Ulrike Janzen: “Das Lugano-Übereinkommen vom 30.10.2007? [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
