Search for: "Wagner v. Smith"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
Smith? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
See Adam Wagner’s post on the subject here. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Unsurprisingly, articles related to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act signed into law on Sept. 16 are starting to show up:[2036 downloads] Predicting Patent Litigation, by Colleen V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Smith & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Crim 1772 (19 July 2011): Court of Appeal: Blanket internet bans for Sexual Offences Prevention Orders always disproportionate; court gives general guidance. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:17 pm
Smith, 151 S.W.3d 225, 233 (Tex. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Mauerhan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
Smith & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2011] EWHC 1676 (QB) (30 June 2011): Human rights claims of 6 soldiers killed or injured in Iraq allegedly due to faulty equipment/ poor training struck out following decision in R(Smith) in Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Appx. 446 (6th Cir. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:13 pm
May do it because, darn it, there just aren't any real issues here.Still, as Justice Souter recognized in a footnote to his dissent in Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm
RollonFriday reports… Exclusive: Herbert Smith to pay lawyers £10 an hour Herbert Smith’s new Belfast outpost is rumoured to be paying its lawyers as little as £10 per hour. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Smith (a Dubya appointee), which in the first round was reversed on summary judgment of non-infringement. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Wagner v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:03 am
This is a postscript to Adam Wagner’s post this morning on the UKSC decision in R (Smith) v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
App. 1979) (label change); Smith v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
Grace - Yes Stender, Linda - Yes Thompson, Samuel D. - Yes Tucker, Cleopatra G. - Yes Vainieri Huttle, Valerie - Yes Van Pelt, Daniel M. - Yes Vandervalk, Charlotte - Yes Vas, Joseph - Not Voting Voss, Joan M. - Yes Wagner, Connie - Yes Watson Coleman, Bonnie - Yes Webber, Jay - Yes Wisniewski, John S. - Yes Wolfe, David W. - Yes ......... [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
"It was error to dismiss the first cause of action merely because plaintiff is not entitled to the declaration he seeks (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]); the proper course is to declare in favor of defendants (see Holliswood Care Ctr. v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004 [1983]; Mongelli v Sharp, 140 AD2d 273 [1988]). [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Smith emphasized his choice of a running royalty over a lump-sum payment. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
See CIAS, Inc. v. [read post]
