Search for: "Waits v. Mississippi" Results 61 - 80 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 1992, the Supreme Court said a 24-hour waiting period for an abortion is OK. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:37 pm by Kalvis Golde
This fall, the justices will hear a major abortion case from Mississippi intended to challenge Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 7:41 am
 Mississippi petitioned for SCOTUS review [in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Under the policy, non-Mexican asylum applicants who enter the United States at the nation’s southern border must wait in Mexico while their applications are processed. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm by SCOTUStalk
And then we waited, and we waited and we waited. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
But if you do choose to pre-record yourself nodding and sipping coffee, spend your free time listening to Marlene’s summary of the recent copyright litigation of Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm by Josh Blackman
Wait a few years and the Court would eventually clarify the doctrine. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am by Marcia Coyle
A group of white and black clergymen on a prayer pilgrimage to promote racial integration tried to use a segregated interstate bus terminal waiting room in Jackson, Mississippi, in 1961. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Murder case on Tinder, which was v. helpful. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]