Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Matter of" Results 61 - 80 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Reyes, 272 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tex. 2008) (noting that, by enacting the TCHRA, the Texas Legislature "intended to correlate state law with federal law in employment discrimination cases") (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Mayes, 236 S.W.3d 754, 755 (Tex. 2007) (per curiam); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2017 IL App (1st) 171940 which effectively means that that case is good law. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that disparate impact claims under Title VII challenge “a facially neutral policy or practice that causes a disparate impact on a protected group, even if the employer has no intent to discriminate,” the court observed that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:06 am by Kimpo Ngoi
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 374 F.3d 428 (6th Cir. 2004) (discrimination based on breast-feeding does not present a viable Title VII claim). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Ad Law Defense
  In all, the consolidated litigation involves more than 70 companies including grocery stores, coffee companies, food manufacturers and big-box retailers, such as Whole Foods Market, Trader Joe’s Co., Peet’s Coffee & Tea Inc., Nestle USA Inc., Costco Wholesale Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 6:50 pm by Francis Pileggi
” See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 95 A.3d at 1278 (that decision was previously highlighted on these pages). [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am by MBettman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., suggesting that the misrepresenting or even withholding of evidence might be an actionable wrong, was dicta.) [read post]