Search for: "Walgreen's Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Walgreen Co., 18-349 Issues: (1) Whether an accommodation that merely lessens or has the potential to eliminate the conflict between work and religious practice is “reasonable” per se, as the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 and January 17 conferences) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:51 am by News Desk
Fuji Food Products Inc. has initiated a recall of ready to eat sushi, salads and spring rolls due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 1:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Walgreen, the plaintiffs argue, the Seventh Circuit was reviewing fees awarded in connection with a settlement on behalf of a shareholder class. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 9:29 am by Xi Lucy Shi
” Factual evidence and statistics, such as an unprecedented opioid-related increase in overdose deaths over the last decade, show that the conduct of Purdue Pharma LP, pharmacies such as Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc and drug distributors such as AmerisourceBergen Corp interfered with the right to public safety. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Sherri Miyagi, a dentist, was visiting a Walgreens pharmacy when she was injured by a hand truck operated by an employee of the defendant, Dean Transportation Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” This, Judge Durkin said, is the merger objection lawsuit “racket” that Judge Posner identified in the Walgreen case, and that Judge Posner said “must end. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., which asks whether the Hobbs Act, a jurisdictional-channeling statute, requires courts to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s interpretation of a statute allowing recipients of “junk faxes” to sue the senders for damages. [read post]