Search for: "Walker v. Attorney General State of New York"
Results 61 - 80
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Submitted by: Theodore Pollack, Senior Law Librarian, New York County Public Access Law Library. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Walker 14-803Issue: (1) Whether a state’s voter ID law violates the Equal Protection Clause where, unlike in Crawford v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Blitt is one of the firms in the Transworld/NCO "Attorney Network," and was hired to collect debts against some of the Plaintiffs. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm
Walker dismissed that case, Jewel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
(Photo: James Estrin, New York Times) The New York Times has a new, five page article article on Rudy Giuliani's Bernie Kerik problem, explaining how it casts doubt on his credibility, his leadership potential and his judgment. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Walker is a law professor at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
The editorial boards of the New York Times, L.A. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 10:21 am
This argument actually succeeded in persuading New York’s high court to deny a gay-marriage constitutional claim in 2006 in Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
See generally Ceasar v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/20/07 referred to codes
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5587
Seminerio -- Requires the district attorney to notify all victims of case disposition SUMM : Amd S440.50, CP L Requires the district attorney to inform a victim by letter of the final disposition of a case against a defendant, in order to give such victim the opportunity to exercise his right to give a victim impact statement. 02/20/07 referred to codes
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5588
Morelle (MS) --… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
Allied Part 2: “Clean Up” of Compromising Social Media Evidence Can Result in Severe Sanctions -bit.ly/zrKTaS (K&L Gates) Letter, Reassess, Repeat: Avoiding Privilege Waiver After Notice of Inadvertent Production of Documents – bit.ly/ydBJGg (Mark Kaddis) New Wage and Hour Class Action Decision Broadens Obligation To Preserve Documents - bit.ly/zlq8HF (Fulbright & Jaworski) NLRB General Counsel Issues Second Report on Social Media Cases |… [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
That afternoon Attorney General Jeff Sessions testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on the Russia investigation. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:50 pm
DATE: February 22, 2018 Where: SUNY Global Center, New York, NY Register Here. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Jones(IP finance) Poland New Chairman of the Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys (Class 46) South Africa Department of Trade & Industry proceeds with plans to convert CIPRO into self-standing commission (Afro-IP) CIPRO Risk Manager suspended on charge of ‘breach of confidentiality’ (Afro-IP) Spain Supreme Court on slogan trade marks: no need of a special treatment (if anyone still doubted) (Class 46) Rock band La Quinta Estación name… [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
The Gillespies answered by filing a general denial along with a verified denial raising their assertion that the Trust did not have the capacity to sue because it is not a legal entity. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert v Bush, No C 07-0693) and those… [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
On June 30, 1971 — 17 days after Sheehan’s first article — the justices ruled 6-3 in New York Times v. [read post]
