Search for: "Walker v. Day"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 4:35 pm
The GAB is putting the burden on Walker to challenge the signature, but its rules give Walker "only 10 days to examine, compare and then challenge more than 540,000 signatures – more than 50,000 signatures a day," which the complaint calls "a practical impossibility. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
Severe dehydration, according to physicians quoted in the case of Manor Care Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:27 pm
UPDATE: Joshua Spivak weighs in: The argument that Walker will only have 10 days to review the signatures (if that limit remains) is mitigated by the fact that Walker and his family are not checking signatures with some hearty band of volunteers. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm
Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
But Judge Walker did. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:02 am
“In the week commencing 14 November 2011, a seven-member panel of Justices of the Supreme Court (L Phillips, L Walker, L Hale, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr and L Wilson) heard the Claimants’ appeal from the Court of Appeal’s decision in the Atomic Veterans Litigation (AB v Ministry of Defence [2010] EWCA Civ 1317). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:27 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled in the case of Graham v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
First off, let's deal with a bit of news from the ongoing trench warfare between the entity formerly known as the Scruggs Katrina Group and State Farm known as McIntosh v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
In Courtroom 1 from Monday 31 October Lords Hope, Walker, Clarke, Dyson and Collins will hear Lehman Brothers International v CRC Credit Fund Limited and GLC Investments PLC Sub Fund – European Equity Fund over four days. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
The Third Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 3:20 am
Justice Kennedy is certainly very important in the prediction of what the Supreme Court will do, and Walker may have written with the intent to influence him, but let's give Sandra Day O'Connor the respect she deserves. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Starting on Tuesday 7 February 2012 is the two day hearing in front of a panel of seven (Lady Kerr and Lords Phillips, Walker, Kerr, Brown, Dyson and Wilson) of R (KM) (by his mother and litigation friend JM) v Cambridgeshire County Council. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm
Cal.) issued his ruling in Perry v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 10:27 am
Perry v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
There are two appeals being heard in the Supreme Court this week, commencing on Monday 11 April 2011 with R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, to be heard over two days by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
” The ruling comes in the case of Friends of Scott Walker v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
It's Day 3 of the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:04 am
PACER reveals this has been a busy day in McIntosh v. [read post]
