Search for: "Walsh v. Means"
Results 61 - 80
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 12:05 pm
Noel Canning and McCullen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice and Comment blog, Michael Kagan looks at what Justice Neil Gorsuch’s two opinions in an immigration case decided last August when Gorsuch was a judge on the court of appeals could mean for next term’s reargument in Sessions v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Moreover, the exercise of constitutional rights “may be regulated by the Oireachtas when the common good requires this” (Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, 312 (HC; Kenny J) affd [1965] IR 294, 345, [1965] IESC 1 (3 July 1965) [23] (Ó Dálaigh CJ; Lavery, Kingsmill Moore, Haugh and Walsh JJ concurring); see, recently, Burke v Minister for Education [2022] IESC 1 (24 January 2022) [95] (O’Donnell… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
By Eric Goldman Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am
Mark Walsh examines the role of federal enforcement after Brown (here) and at the still-ongoing legal battles in one Mississippi city (here). [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:02 am
According to Walsh, this violated the first amendment, as applied to political patronage in Elrod v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next week’s arguments in King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:32 am
, Moore v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:38 am
A. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Walsh Doctor Loses Defamation Case Over Online Remarks–McKee v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:51 pm
In an unreported (non-precedential) decision in the case of Brown v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
" -- four months after Walsh's murder. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:35 am
Further oral arguments in SCOTUS will have to await the ringing in of the New Year — January 9, to be specific — but while that means there are 28 more shopping days until we get to see Scalia and Breyer verbally jousting, with Thomas sitting mutely by, it doesn’t mean the Court’s out of session. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In the absence of a statutory definition, we construe words of ordinary import with their usual and commonly understood meaning, and in that connection have regarded dictionary definitions as useful guideposts in determining the meaning of a word or phrase" (Matter of Walsh v New York [*3]State Comptroller, 34 NY3d at 524 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Schwabler v DiNapoli, 194 AD3d 1235, 1237 [3d Dept… [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In the absence of a statutory definition, we construe words of ordinary import with their usual and commonly understood meaning, and in that connection have regarded dictionary definitions as useful guideposts in determining the meaning of a word or phrase" (Matter of Walsh v New York [*3]State Comptroller, 34 NY3d at 524 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Schwabler v DiNapoli, 194 AD3d 1235, 1237 [3d Dept… [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
In our judgment, the same approach to construction leads to the conclusion that article 23 of the Directive must be given its natural and wide meaning so as to include both material and non-material damage. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:18 am
Where, as here, there is no allegation that defendants authored the defamatory statements, it is not appropriate to permit discovery to determine if a cause of action exists ( see Walsh v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:36 am
In late June of last year, the Supreme Court ruled in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Back in 1998, in State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:38 pm
US v. [read post]
