Search for: "Ware v. U.s.*" Results 61 - 67 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm by Kristyn Melvin and Matt Bonovich
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for information… [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
” But here’s the real punch line: Drug users and software users are about equally likely to recover damages for whatever harms those wares cause them. [read post]