Search for: "Warner Music, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
In White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:16 am
EMI, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group had also been accused of engaging in pay-for-play practices. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:11 am
May 13, 2024 | By: David Trinnes The Supreme Court recently ruled 6-3 in the case of Warner Chappell Music, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:24 pm
The song allegedly generates at least $2 million a year in licensing fees for Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:40 pm
Warner Music Group Corp. sued Imeem Inc., a music-based social networking Web site, on Tuesday for infringing the copyright of its artists including Madonna, Red Hot Chili Peppers and Green Day. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:30 pm
Apple’s Jobs calls on music industry to drop DRM - pdf Apple Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Cal. 2010); Warner Bros. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:25 pm
Since Apple does not own or control any music itself, it must license the rights to distribute music from others, primarily the ‘big four’ music companies: Universal, Sony BMG, Warner and EMI. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:15 pm
Those members are:EMI Music CanadaSony Music Entertainment Canada Inc.Universal Music Canada Inc. [read post]
1 May 2008, 5:07 am
Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
However, in a notice filed with Google on behalf of Warner Brothers by Vobile Inc., several legitimate sites were included including several pages. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
Warner Music Group, 4:2012cv00870, filed Feb. 22, 2012, NDCA. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:18 am
The majors — including Walt Disney, Warners, News Corp. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Meantime, let’s take a look at the music played on YouTube. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
Records, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, and UMG Recording, Inc. -- are participating jointly in this lawsuit and, presumably, would have joint access to this information. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
The court pointed to the plaintiffs’ contention that the defendants—EMI, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group Recordings, Inc., and Warner Music Group Corp. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:58 am
However, currently Warner Chappel Music currently licenses the songs for commercial purposes to the tune of $2 million per year. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
By Dennis Crouch and Timothy Knight On May 9, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:14 am
The verdict against Las Vegas-based Rimini Street Inc. and CEO Seth Ravin followed a two-week trial in U.S. [read post]
