Search for: "Washington v. Trump" Results 61 - 80 of 2,757
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
In Washington, starting on January 1, 2024, only workers who earn more than $120,559.99 per year for employees or $301,399.98 per year for independent contractors can be held to non-competition agreements. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Its longest chapter will likely be the story of what the Court did in 2024, with the Trump cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
"From the Washington Post: "The antislavery giant at the center of the Trump disqualification case. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]