Search for: "Washington v. Marks"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“The time has come to blow the whistle on the Holmes Devise History of The Supreme Court,” a young professor of law at the University of Wisconsin named Mark V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[2] Lincoln arrived in Washington under the cover of night. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Jim Jordan Case No.: 1:23-cv-03032 (civil proceedings) Background: Mark Pomerantz opening statement in congressional deposition (May 12, 2023) Notice of Dismissal Following Settlement (April 24, 2023) Opinion and Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order (April 19, 2023) Amicus Brief Supporting Alvin Bragg Motion for Interim Injunctive Relief (April 17, 2023) Mark Pomerantz Declaration Supporting Alvin Bragg Complaint (April 17, 2023) Mark Pomerantz Response Supporting… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm
Kip Viscusi (Vanderbilt), Dick Pierce (George Washington University), Thomas Merrill (American University), Kristin Hickman (University of Minnesota), and Mason Marks (University of New Hampshire Law/Petrie-Flom Center, Harvard). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
The Lawsuit is in federal court in the Western District of Washington, case No. 2- 23-cv-00647, with short caption of The Second Amendment Foundation v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:45 am
Facebook * Meta Platforms, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
The Independent, the Guardian, Reuters, The Washington Post and the New York Times covered the story. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
January 10, 2024 Speaker Mike Johnson H-232 The Capitol Washington, D.C. 20515 Chairman Mark Green 2446 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Constitutional Law Experts on the Impeachment ProceedingsAgainst Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas Senior Republicans in the House of Representatives—including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Chairman Mark Green of the Committee on Homeland Security—have stated that they intend… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
It's modeled largely off what Steve Sachs and Ernie Young did at Duke, as well as what Judge Katsas and Alida Kass are doing at George Washington. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm
There is a marked contrast between the controlling facts of this case and the facts of Time, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
