Search for: "Watson v. Price" Results 61 - 80 of 126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm by Alix McKenna
This March, the Supreme Court is slated to hear oral arguments in Commission v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
The WTO release explains similar trade benefits for services imports, investment, intellectual property, and it elaborates on how the Russian government has - or has committed to in the near future - liberalized its economy with respect to subsidies, price controls, export restrictions, technical regulations/standards, government procurement, and transparency. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:17 am
Brightman J. referred to a number of cases in which such an award had been made, of Watson, Laidlow & Co. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/JfabGe (Thomas Watson) Malicious Cyber Attacks Increased by 81 Percent in 2011 and Data Breaches Up - bit.ly/JVM3gd (Cynthia Larose) Maryland’s Facebook Username and Password Law is a Win For Employers, Employees, and Job Applicants - bit.ly/IprgxZ (Bradley Shear) Microsoft Updates Exchange Server Deployment Assistant - bit.ly/J0ndd7 (John Mello) No, Encryption Is Not Enough to Protect Your Data - bit.ly/KuC4KH (Hendry Betts) Oracle… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
David Price Solicitors & Advocates acted for the defendant, which publicly apologised to the Claimant. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
Paying heed to Lord Shaw's classic statement in Watson Laidlaw & Co v Pott Cassels & Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104, at which he noted that "The restoration by way of compensation is therefore accomplished to a large extent by the exercise of sound imagination and the practice of the broad axe", the judge therefore set to swinging. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Mail’s counsel, Jonathan Caplan, argued that the paper’s data requests outlined in the ‘What Price Privacy Now‘ report (2006) were legal. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:08 am by Rob Robinson
(Part One) – http://tinyurl.com/3p8hbzp (eDiscovery Team) A Timely Warning to Employees About Social Media – http://tinyurl.com/3vjacww (Amanda Bronstad) Baglow v Smith – The Increasing Importance of Context in Defamation Claims - http://tinyurl.com/44pmecq (Bob Tarantino) Connecticut Courts Weigh In on Social Media as Evidence – http://tinyurl.com/3hgy34v (Marie Grady) D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:02 am by war
Thus, in Watson, Laidlaw & Co Ltd v Pott, Cassels and Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104, Lord Shaw expressed the principle: wherever an abstraction or invasion of property has occurred, then, unless such abstraction or invasion were to be sanctioned by law, the law ought to yield a recompense under the category or principle, as I say, of price or hire. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:09 am by Marie Louise
A-G’s opinion published – Merck & Co Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (EPLAW) (The SPC Blog) US: Supreme Court to revisit patentable subject matter eligibility of medical diagnostic methods:  Mayo v Prometheus (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (PharmaPatents) (IPBiz) (Patent Law Practice Center) US: Intellectual property problems for personalized medicine (BIOtechNow) US: Supreme Court ruling in Stanford v Roche (IPKat) (IPKat) US:… [read post]