Search for: "Watters v. Watters" Results 61 - 80 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
Justices Scalia and Thomas each issued a dissenting opinion; Watters v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
-At the Consumer Law and Policy Blog, Deepak Gupta discusses the Court's decision in Watters v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:37 pm
From The Blog of Legal Times: For the last two years, Justice Clarence Thomas has consistently recused himself in cases in which Wachovia Bank is a party -- most notably the landmark decision last week in Watters v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 12:31 pm
At the Washington Post, Tomoeh Murakami Tse discusses Watters v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 7:17 pm
Justice Thomas recused himself in Watters v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:48 am
   This past term, the Court faced a very similar deference/federal preemption question in Watters v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:20 pm
Finally, Todd Zywicki, in this post on the Volokh Conspiracy, mentions an AEI program about Watters v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 10:20 pm by Ted Frank
[NYT] "Dodd-Frank reform law invites new litigation opportunities against mortgage lenders," overturns Watters v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm by Adam Levitin
First of Omaha (Nat'l Bank Act preemption) Watters v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Lastly, Steve Vladeck has this post at Concurring Opinions discussing the significance of the Court's decision in Watters v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 2:14 pm
by Elizabeth Renuart (National Consumer Law Center) Rather than discussing why the majority may be legally wrong (the dissent does an excellent job of that), my thoughts focus on the lines drawn by the decision and its potential practical effects. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
EPA, No. 05-1120, issued 4/2/2007), and Justice Ginsburg (Watters v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Julie Lam
  Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Watters v Wachovia Bank, NA, 550 US 1 (2000), the Court of Appeals focused on the exercise of the national bank’s power to make real estate transactions. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
It's a full-blown panel discussion, sponsored by AEI, on Watters v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
It's a full-blown panel discussion, sponsored by AEI, on Watters v. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 1:07 pm
I realize that I stated in a previous post that the Conference of State Banking Supervisors had informed me that it intended to post on the CSBS site the briefs filed by Wachovia Bank and its supporters in the pending US Supreme Court case of Watters v. [read post]