Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 61 - 80 of 6,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2010, 2:52 pm by rgeorges
Lawyers are always being asked why we defend guilty people, or why we don't join in the pre-judging of an issue, based upon our perceived prejudices or potential threat. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 6:58 am
You can't vote out federal judges or prosecutors.Additionally, the feds prioritize what they prosecute, states and counties don't. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:29 pm by Jeffrey
Attorneys don't have great senses of humor. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:12 pm by Jeff Gamso
  (I hope she reconsidered after the firestorm of invective against her inanity, though I don't know.) [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:21 am
And those effects wouldn't be pretty.That's why we don't want to be forced to think the unthinkable.Happy Thanksgiving to all! [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:32 pm by Rumpole
MOTION DENIED.Counsel for the defendant got into it with Schwartz, but the Judge wouldn't budge. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:05 am
" I don't think that's going to be too successful.... [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:36 pm
Which is one reason why, for example, we don't conduct in absentia criminal trials (unless the defendant absconds after the trial commences). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:51 am by Nexsen Pruet
If you don't preserve the error, I can't help you.As of Monday, I no longer care if the judge awarded the plaintiff damages for breach of contract. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 11:16 pm
Creating new procedural tools to protect innocence won't help if defendants' lawyers don't aggressively avail themselves of them.When even Reason magazine thinks government is underspending on one of its functions, it's hard not to think we might have reached a tipping point in regards to changing public perception in the wake of 200+ DNA exonerations. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:53 pm
Thomas in about as eloquent a fashion as anyone possibly could have:MPAA to judge: We don't need no stinking proofThe MPAA is arguing in legal brief that plaintiffs should be allowed to collect hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages with no proof that anyone has actually downloaded from a defendant's shared folder. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:32 am
 Thankfully we have some judges who don't run in that hamster wheel that the government tries to force them into. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:29 am
 If it's after Wednesday, and we don't have anything else to do then it's time for  3RD DCA ROUNDUP!!!! [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:14 pm
We don't know about you, but we were getting awfully tired of looking at Davis's mug. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:38 pm by Walter Reaves
I've said before that I sincerely believe we will be judged by how we judge the least among us. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 1:13 pm
As we said, they don't make judges like Tom Petersen anymore, and unfortunately that is by design. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:20 am by Walter Reaves
I've said before that I believe we are all going to be judged on the decisions and choices we make. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:04 am
We recently wrote about the challenge to appointment of the Copyright Royalty Board's judges filed by Royalty Logic as part of the appeal of the Board's decision on Internet Radio royalties. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:14 pm by Rumpole
UPDATES BELOW:Reprinted (without permission- we didn't ask, but we're sure they don't mind) from the Broward JAA Blog. [read post]