Search for: "Wearing v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
News), Richard Wolf of USA Today, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Bob Barnes and Amber Phillips of The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In the Texas Lawyer (subscription or registration required), Miriam Rozen reports on last week’s decision in Commil USA v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:38 am by Norman Gregory Fernandez
Unruh Civil Rights, Act CC 51, et seq. and Cohen V California, a Supreme Court ruling, that stated that individuals have the right under the First Amendment to wear clothing which displays writing or designs. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:03 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog, while Mark Walsh covered the grant in Star Athletica v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
This volume explores the legal aspects of hashtags as trade marks in the EU, Germany, and the USA, and considered whether the law currently maintains the balance between freedom of expression and protection of competition. [read post]
Brazil soccer game, $2,068 at a 2018 NFL game, $1,413 at a 2019 concert event, $2,856 at 2019 USA v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Over half an hour after the execution began, a doctor wearing a blue hood to cover his face entered the execution chamber to check Angel Diaz's vital signs. [read post]