Search for: "Wells v. C. I. R.*#"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,677
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
See also Matter of H-R- , 7 I & N Dec. 651 (R.C. 1958)). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
I. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Apr. 28, 2020) ("[C]laims involving sexual orientation … are examples of matters that qualify as being highly sensitive and of a personal nature. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
-EV] I'm especially interested in pieces that work well with newcomers to the debates. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
The judge held that the defence of statutory acquiescence raised by the Defendants under section 48 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994), could not succeed because the five year period only starts to run when the earlier trade mark owner has knowledge of both the use of the later trade mark, and of its registration (applying Case C-482/09, Budejovický Budvar np v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2011] ECR I-08701). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:12 am
DSA before Courts After being designated, Amazon and Zalando filed their lawsuits against the designation decisions (Amazon v EC (T-367/23), and Zalando v EC (T-348/23)). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
I shall divide my study into two parts: the first one, mainly descriptive, where I shall present the book under analysis; and the second one, more evaluative, where I shall offer a critical review of Sunstein’s work. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
” (the Decision).c. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Violation of this paragraph is a Class C crime. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Such affirmation shall be in substantially the following form:” I affirm this ___ day of ______, ____, under the penalties of perjury under the laws of New York, which may include a fine or imprisonment, that I am physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, that the foregoing is true, and I understand… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
C. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sorel-Tracy (Ville de) c. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Air Force C-17 to Egypt [were] subsequently transported via ground into Gaza and then distributed by U.N. agencies. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
R (UNISON) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (2023) UKSC 45 Full transparency – I acted for Crisis on an intervention in this case. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
§ 315(c). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The CJEU has said that the extensive use which is made of a mark is relevant to the assessment of confusion in Specsavers v Asda (C-252/12), but I think the judge has stretched that principle too far.Lots of options to read more about this case here.3. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
As a practicing scientist and frequent peer reviewer, I can testify that Chubin’s view is correct. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:17 am
” Alison C. v. [read post]
