Search for: "Wells v. Gillette"
Results 61 - 80
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm
Virginia (state run college cannot refuse to admit women), Thompsen v Oklahoma (Eighth Amendment prohibits the execution of children under 16), and Miranda v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
" Gillette Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:21 pm
The patentee in Aspex Eyewear Inc. v Clariti Eyewear, Inc. might have done well to heed my warning. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm
Governor Malloy's statement points out that in the twelve years prior to Furman v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
Generally, defense counsel is well acquainted with the challenges of interviewing child victims, and clear safeguards are in place for such occurrences. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
Verner (1963) (assessing whether government's interest is "'compelling'"), with Gillette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:18 pm
” The CJEU in Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy made clear that the condition of ‘honest use’: “…was in substance the expression of a duty to act fairly in relation to the legitimate interests of the trade mark owner. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:04 pm
Gillette Co., 857 F. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
It's really smart and well done. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm
Unfortunately the remedial constructive trust is a much less well understood tool for the English lawyer. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
Co. v Gillette Co. (64 NY2d 304 [1984]): "[W]henever an insurer wishes to exclude certain coverage from its policy obligations, it must do so in clear and unmistakable language. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm
He was not changing his ruling.Which brings me to the Seventh Circuit fiasco known as Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
The Supreme Court said that Colorado was “well aware” of the statute of limitations defense. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Emerson (pictured) in Gillette v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm
Some might remember that the parties in Lochner v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:47 am
Court of Appeals in Cincinnati has ruled (Kia Motors America, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm
Supreme Court review in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:42 am
Well, Paul and I have found common ground, after all: We drafted an amicus brief in the "Soda Ban" case and persuaded four other law profs (Kathleen Morris (Golden Gate), my colleague Clay Gillette, Rick Su (SUNY Buffalo), and Michael Herz (Cardozo) to sign it. [read post]
