Search for: "Wells v. Guzman" Results 61 - 80 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Genovese v Guzman, Decision and Order, Index No. 608246/15 [Sup Ct Nassau County Mar. 31, 2016], is another one of those cases. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
  The trial court judge held a hearing on the motion and at that hearing,neither Minassian nor the State introduced testimony from live witnesses, but the trial court admitted without objection an affidavit from Special Agent Hutchins as well as a copy of the federal warrant and color copies of the two different California driver's licenses. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:14 am by John McFarland
On January 29, the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hysaw v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:35 am by John McFarland
Justice Brown wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Willett, Guzman and Lehrmann. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Judge Guzman bifurcated the case into two parts, with a damages phase to follow the initial liability phase. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Unfortunately for Kevin Rangel-Guzman, the drug detection dog at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry was having a fine day on September 5, 2011, when Rangel-Guzman and a friend attempted to reenter the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:25 am
Feb. 3, 2014), and he wasn’t the first — see, for instance, this Florida trial court ruling, as well as State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Surely not, but, well, it takes a while for things to get to that point. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Sysco Corporation’s allegations that, in an attempt to cover up his unauthorized access and disclosure of protected information to a competitor, a former employee deleted emails from the “sent” and “deleted” folders of his email account, was sufficient to constitute a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), a federal district court in Illinois ruled in denying the employee’s motion to dismiss this claim (Sysco Corp v Katz, October 3, 2013,… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 10:12 am by Kirk Jenkins
  Counsel pointed out that after the Fifth District’s decision in Rogers had come down, the First District, Division Five had decided the same question the opposite way in Guzman v. 7513 West Madison Street, Inc. [read post]