Search for: "White v. Grey"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2013, 10:16 am
The color is supposed to suggest an idea: the twilight zone is a grey area (get it?) [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:13 am
Torres v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 3:18 pm
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Harney v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:30 am
The FRAUD-O-METER™ illustrates the current state of trademark fraud jurisprudence: the now defunct Medinol standard is depicted by the grey arrow resting in the “Negligence” wedge, while the white arrow, representing our post-Bose uncertainty, unsurely leans toward the “Reckless Disregard” wedge. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:36 am
Loving v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:46 am
" Loving v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:42 pm
Supreme Court decision, Loving v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here), following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as Gandalf… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
White v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 am
Judge Birss described (at [1]) the image as 'largely in black and white, with the Houses of Parliament and the bridge shown in grey. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:20 pm
We want the rules of legal ethics to be have meaning, but it does not help the profession or society as a whole if the rules, when applied to certain factual situations, do not lend themselves to simple “black and white” answers, as opposed to shades of grey. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Afro-IP) Australia VSC: Mitre 10 refused interlocutory injunction to stop “Masters” using a blue, white and grey get-up for hardware store: Mitre 10 Australia Pty Ltd v Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd (ipwars) Bennett J holds Zetco patent for hot water heater valves valid and infringed by Austworld Commodities (IP Whiteboard) Cameroon A to Z of African official IP websites: no. 6: Cameroon (Afro-IP) Canada Good faith: The atomic… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Afro-IP) Australia VSC: Mitre 10 refused interlocutory injunction to stop “Masters” using a blue, white and grey get-up for hardware store: Mitre 10 Australia Pty Ltd v Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd (ipwars) Bennett J holds Zetco patent for hot water heater valves valid and infringed by Austworld Commodities (IP Whiteboard) Cameroon A to Z of African official IP websites: no. 6: Cameroon (Afro-IP) Canada Good faith: The atomic… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:12 am
Mitre 10 has been refused an interlocutory injunction to stop “Masters” using a blue, white and grey get-up for a hardware store. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
Regardless, it works as advertised, allowing for redacted areas to appear as either a block of white, black, red, green or blue. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am
The firm previously was known as Howrey & Simon and Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Grey market goods = courts often abandon the factors. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:06 pm
On this brief, I hit the jackpot with page 57, Steven Shapiro and the ACLU, and a facts section from Hudson v. [read post]
